Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:03:33
Message-Id: 1332268650.9921.16.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03 by Mike Gilbert
El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:32 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: > > Since there is no need to stay in the herd some prefixed time, I see no > > reason to allow developers to be in mail aliases without adding them to > > herds.xml, and this allows others to "easily" review herds.xml looking > > for empty herds. > > > > >From what you've said, the mail alias should just be ignored when > reviewing herds. > > It is possible that the people on the alias are simply curious and > have no intention of maintaining anything. I don't have a problem with > that. > >
But we need to clearly state that, when a herd is empty in herds.xml we should consider their packages as orphan even if some devs are listed in the alias.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies