1 |
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:15:14 -0800 |
2 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:58 AM David Seifert <soap@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 09:23 +0000, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
7 |
> > > I can certainly appreciate the benefits of this as I just haven't had |
8 |
> > > the time to read most of the recent... uh... discussions. However, the |
9 |
> > > idea of enforcing something like this doesn't bear thinking about. It |
10 |
> > > reminds me way too much of 1984's Newspeak. If we're not going to |
11 |
> > > enforce it then there seems little point in including it. The most |
12 |
> > > verbose posters are unlikely to cut down just because we asked them |
13 |
> > > nicely. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > The debian code of conduct has a section called "Try to be concise". |
18 |
> > Would you really consider the Debian CoC Newspeak? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I think the concern is that sometimes the CoC is wielded as a cudgel: e.g. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> "Be concise or I will ban you from the ML" |
23 |
> |
24 |
> This is different than as a *principle* or a *guideline*. I think its |
25 |
> fine to say "We in Gentoo have a principle to be concise." This means |
26 |
> when someone posts a very long post you can simply reply |
27 |
> |
28 |
> "Hi, Gentoo has a principle of concision, please try to apply that to |
29 |
> your posts in future; I'm not going to respond to long messages." |
30 |
> |
31 |
> We have similar principles for code reviews (e..g don't send me a 1000 |
32 |
> LoC review, send me 4 250 line ones broken apart so I can understand |
33 |
> the changes.) It doesn't mean one can't send big reviews, but it means |
34 |
> that when I get a 1000 LoC code review..the first thing I'm gonna do |
35 |
> is tell the author "please break this up" and then the review goes to |
36 |
> the bottom of my priority list. |
37 |
|
38 |
Agreed and I think the key words in Debian's case are "Try to". If |
39 |
enforcement is not the intention here and it's worded appropriately then |
40 |
I don't have a problem with including it merely as a guideline. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
44 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |