1 |
On 2022-03-09 00:21, Andriy Utkin wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I suggest to not leave it that way, and at very least to make a public |
4 |
> statement condemning this aggressive war. I am happy to contribute to |
5 |
> the draft but I'd like to first hear what others think, so that whatever |
6 |
> statement we get, if any, is actually a reflection of our consensus, not |
7 |
> my soapbox speech. |
8 |
|
9 |
I was going to comment here about FOSS projects in general fall |
10 |
somewhere between individuals and formal organisations, how even in case |
11 |
of Gentoo it is not entirely clear to me whether the Council's mandate |
12 |
to decide on global Gentoo issues actually extends to it being |
13 |
considered a representation of Gentoo community, how... Except none of |
14 |
this really matters. Please draft a statement and ask the Council to |
15 |
consider it ASAP - technically speaking our next meeting is THIS SUNDAY, |
16 |
even if matters I am not at liberty to discuss here have resulted in |
17 |
thee having been no usual call for agenda items or the publication of |
18 |
the agenda itself. We might have to make the voting secret but I doubt |
19 |
anyone will actually prevent the vote itself from happening... While I |
20 |
do get mgorny's point, recent decisions within e.g. the |
21 |
nuclear-and-particle-physics community (which, I should remind you all, |
22 |
managed to stay apolitical for much of the Cold War and in fact did a |
23 |
rather splendid job allowing for some levels of communication, and even |
24 |
collaboration, between the two blocs to be continuously maintained) show |
25 |
that we are now, regrettably, beyond still being able to have the luxury |
26 |
of "staying out of it". |
27 |
|
28 |
> I also would like to encourage any ideas of how Gentoo could possibly |
29 |
> take any reasonable action. |
30 |
|
31 |
That has already been touched upon by the others in this thread so I'll |
32 |
keep it brief: there simply aren't many actions we can take. Some FOSS |
33 |
projects have in the near past attempted to include various forms |
34 |
"cannot be used for evil" clauses in their respective licensing |
35 |
agreements - with the most common result being said licences no longer |
36 |
being recognised as FOSS. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Marecki |