| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14-11-2012 08:42:47 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The stabilization of new udev shouldn't be delayed anymore. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> We reached a different conclusion yesterday. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think the end result of the council decision won't really involve |
| 8 |
further delay of things for udev. There are a few blockers to resolve |
| 9 |
still, so waiting another meeting will allow both efforts to continue |
| 10 |
to make progress, and then when we send out communications to users we |
| 11 |
can offer them all the viable options. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The council isn't really introducing delay until everything is ready |
| 14 |
for udev to go stable other than the go-ahead to give users n days to |
| 15 |
migrate to a separate /usr solution. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Rich |
Archives