| 1 |
On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and who |
| 3 |
> > can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the GLEP that Petteri |
| 4 |
> > refers to. Does it make sense to vote for this topic without that GLEP |
| 5 |
> > in place? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri |
| 8 |
> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility to |
| 9 |
> devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP defining the |
| 10 |
> devrel policy just like then one for QA. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ok, thanks. |
| 13 |
Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote for transferring |
| 14 |
the cloak responsibility to devrel? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 19 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives