1 |
Nominees, |
2 |
congratulations on your nominations! As part of this year's elections, |
3 |
I'd like to pose five questions to the nominees, that I believe are |
4 |
important factors in considering someone a good candidate for the |
5 |
council: |
6 |
|
7 |
1. Do you feel you have enough time to commit to serving as a Gentoo |
8 |
council member in the 2021/2022 term? Does your commit activity support |
9 |
this? If you served in 2020/2021, have you prepared for council meetings |
10 |
and finished all unfinished business for which you were responsible (as |
11 |
a council member)? |
12 |
|
13 |
2. Project X and Project Y have irreconcilable differences, but you |
14 |
aren't involved with any of the projects. A crucial technical decision |
15 |
needs to be made. How will you react? Will you defer? Do you consider |
16 |
abstaining a viable option for the group of people making decisions as a |
17 |
last resort? |
18 |
|
19 |
3. Given your typical area of responsibility, how have you performed? |
20 |
|
21 |
4. What positive change/idea/plan do you have for Gentoo that you would |
22 |
try to further (not necessarily as a council member)? By positive change |
23 |
I mean actually changing something concrete, not some diffuse notion of |
24 |
"improving how the council acts" or non-tangible deliverable. |
25 |
|
26 |
5. Do you think the council should be more agile - i.e. take decisions |
27 |
for the purpose of propelling Gentoo forward, rather than waiting for |
28 |
the decision to be made for it? Would you consider a small number of |
29 |
departing views on the mailing list or IRC to be enough to derail a |
30 |
proposal? When do you consider a controversial issue to have been |
31 |
discussed enough? |
32 |
|
33 |
Regards |
34 |
David |