1 |
On 04/18/2010 06:54 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 18 April 2010 12:23:22 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Denis Dupeyron<calchan@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> Does the council need a lead? All top-level projects have a lead |
5 |
>>> except the council. Should we maintain this exception? |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> How do we elect a lead? Do the developers do it or should it be left |
8 |
>>> to the newly elected council members? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> , or more like the head of the cabinet of ministers |
11 |
>> (take the final decision based on input from other members)? |
12 |
> This sounds like a "Gentoo Leader" role and not just for the council |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm fine with the council appointing a leader from within, or not, at |
15 |
its own discretion (ie write it up that way). Then the circumstances of |
16 |
the moment will dictate how this is handled. |
17 |
|
18 |
To be binding any non-emergency decision must still be ratified by the |
19 |
council. That's how parliamentary systems work anyway as I understand it. |
20 |
|
21 |
As far as "Gentoo Leader" goes - I'll address that in a different thread. |
22 |
|
23 |
Rich |