| 1 |
> On 15 Dec 2020, at 11:03, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> David Seifert schrieb: |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 15:36 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Finally please also allow me to ask why 30+ days after all of this |
| 6 |
>>> started, nobody from forums team took yet any action, i.e. the post I |
| 7 |
>>> showed on Friday is still untouched. Have I missed an issued |
| 8 |
>>> warning/ban? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> I think the forum mods agree with you: |
| 11 |
>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8543599.html#8543599 |
| 12 |
>>> Of the random set I surveyed, I did not find any posts that, in my |
| 13 |
>>> opinion, rose to the level of a violation. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> "I will note that due to the volume of poorly explained reports, I gave up before reading nearly all the reported posts, so some of the reported posts may well deserve to be reported." |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Ok, so overloading the forum moderation with frivolous requests will obviously lead to the legitimate requests getting inadequate attention. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I consider those who started digging in historical posts and mass reporting them as acting in bad faith here. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That isn’t what actually happened though. Soap and I both reported posts we individually found offensive on the first few pages of the forum. There was no effort to go back through 13+ years of archives and report any infringing material - that would be a huge waste of time on our part and the moderators. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It’s a misrepresentation of two people who figured they’d better follow the formal process to see if _that_ changes anything. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Best regards, |
| 27 |
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 28 |
> |
Archives