Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:24:29
Message-Id: 1312309445.2901.3@NeddySeagoon
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years by Rich Freeman
1 On 2011.08.02 16:49, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > >  But, you are saying that the council has to approve changes for
5 > glep
6 > >  39 before they can come to a vote. This would mean that say a
7 > majority
8 > >  of developers doesn't like something in glep 39, but the council
9 > >  doesn't approve the change. That change will never come to a vote.
10 > In
11 > >  other words, the council has control of the rules that govern it.
12 > Is
13 > >  that what you are intending?
14 > >
15 >
16 > Arguably the current rules are pretty ambiguous for the council. The
17 > rules are fairly explicit for the Foundation, where there are rules
18 > about having membership-convened meetings/etc.
19 >
20 [snip]
21 >
22 > Rich
23 >
24 Team,
25
26 The trustees are legally accountable and responsible for the operation
27 of the Gentoo Foundation Inc. Some things in the bylaws are there to
28 comply with statutes.
29
30 The Gentoo council has no legal standing whatsoever, which I have
31 already said (at FOSEDEM) makes me a little nervous as a trustee, since
32 the council makes decisions on behalf of Gentoo that the Foundation
33 would be held both accountable and responsible for. There have been no
34 issues with that, yet.
35
36 Maybe its time to reorganise Gentoo along standard corporate lines
37 again, as it was before drobbins left. If we go in that direction, the
38 council becomes a technical committee that is part of the Foundation.
39 GLEP39 is no longer needed and the Foundation bylaws are amended to
40 reflect the new structure.
41
42 Such a major change would probably need to be put to a vote of
43 Foundation members as we would be changing the make up of what is
44 legally a company. (Members are equivelent to share/stock holders)
45 Note: Foundation members and Gentoo developers are two intersecting
46 sets.
47
48 This gives rise to all sorts of interesting questions, opportunities
49 possibilities and challenges. Please discuss.
50
51 --
52 Regards,
53
54 Roy Bamford
55 (Neddyseagoon) a member of
56 gentoo-ops
57 forum-mods
58 trustees

Replies