1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> You can do that anyway, with Reply to Sender. Since the whole point of a |
3 |
> list like this is for open discussion, the default should be for replies |
4 |
> to go to the list. It is different for, say, an announce list. The other |
5 |
> Gentoo discussion lists have Reply-To set so omitting it from here seems |
6 |
> more like an omission than policy. |
7 |
|
8 |
I agree with this post completely. Omitting a Reply-To header in this |
9 |
list results in less consistency amongst the mailing lists. If someone |
10 |
is accustomed to most of the other Gentoo mailing lists having a |
11 |
Reply-To header, it would be quite likely for them not to realise that |
12 |
this list is different in that regard. Look at cokehabit for a real life |
13 |
example of this. |
14 |
|
15 |
Neil also has a great point with the fact that this list is for open |
16 |
discussion, and thus the default should be for mail being sent to the |
17 |
list, rather than the sender alone. It would not be difficult for people |
18 |
to click 'Reply to All', but it also would not be difficult for the |
19 |
infra team to set a Reply-To header. I would recommend adding a Reply-To |
20 |
header to this list, if only for the sake of consistency. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
David Shakaryan |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list |