| 1 |
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 15:37 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello Ferris, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > This leaves the subject of the non-meeting unresolved and also the |
| 5 |
> > pending appeals. Probably we should hold the election quickly and pass |
| 6 |
> > that on to the next Council, but I think we should hear from those who |
| 7 |
> > have appeals pending on that. Thus, the CC, assuming email is being |
| 8 |
> > forwarded correctly. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Personally, I think GLEP39 should be followed and an election should |
| 11 |
> take place. The suggestions I've read so far, albeit certainly meant |
| 12 |
> well, all have a "taste", IMHO, and would make (parts of) Gentoo look |
| 13 |
> bad. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If we do proceed with electing a new council. It's not the end of the |
| 16 |
world. Since we would be doing so in a couple months anyway, no? So just |
| 17 |
expediting the elections a bit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 21 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
| 22 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives