Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:30:35
Message-Id: 51B85BD1.2090108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 06/12/2013 01:26 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:17:53 +0100 Markos Chandras
6 > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
7 >> What worries me is that we've reached the point where we need
8 >> the Council to define a policy for adding simple text file to
9 >> packages.
10 >
11 > It shouldn't come as a surprise. People have been up in arms about
12 > what is and isn't allowed when it comes to replacing "official
13 > Gentoo software" for a decade now. This isn't anything new.
14 >
15
16 That is, because we like working solutions. (at least when it's about
17 _replacing_)
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
20 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
21
22 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRuFvRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzAKEH/1U3uojCdWcXTYNVtcQF67Ky
23 a3aXm9W7yuES6+z3N/1t4tEOIC0JB69WPqIuNEXv2RafrT53zSDNdtofsswFmUEL
24 cj7XVk2oXy3GbwN9wfgLgWCIN1pqKpYsIQg6tJtQ1miRL0e6ce5nZwGczPuQlovz
25 m3o91MCvW8rdiDu1N9zkJXfc+sB7HhFx4G9s1D3Oo4vY5SyUGoNXUHQnWhLi2Txu
26 K36i833wvP2E9uRXnlvDp9UvEhACyJhTjNWZga+AtyzfAeWthjVzlc+B/xcbKMfH
27 biDlmf1DRblfRbdfcT2z5JmS0rck+UKTTJocLzwpdi433rsIkkHlQpotxeS7bYg=
28 =lWbF
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----