Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20142.30765.50483.870591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Let's vote on if you are allowed to remove functions from eclasses (or |
| 4 | > break the API in general): |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f797a983b0d11677a1f781e48ab4e97d.xml |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > Last time this came up a decision wasn't reached: |
| 9 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100726-summary.txt |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > The decision should then be documented here: |
| 12 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Why do we need a decision here? Isn't it simply a special case of the |
| 15 | "adding and updating eclasses" policy? |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |