1 |
12.06.2013 16:05, Michał Górny пишет: |
2 |
> Dnia 2013-06-12, o godz. 15:54:29 |
3 |
> Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> napisał(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> But you know about "Assignee" field in bugzilla, do not you? Maintainer |
6 |
>> in this terms is "Assignee", co-maintainer(s) goes in CC field. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'd rather call that a technical limitation of Bugzilla rather than |
9 |
> anything specific. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Of course, there are cases when there's an agreement that there's main |
12 |
> maintainer and co-maintainers, main maintainer and specific area |
13 |
> maintainers and so on. But it's a result of people's decisions |
14 |
> and agreements, and not of Bugzilla being limited. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
I did not mean, that there is no chance for two Gentoo developers to |
18 |
maintain one package in equal manner. Bugzilla is just an example, i |
19 |
understand that only one "Assignee" field is just technical limitaion. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
23 |
Gentoo developer |
24 |
Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead |
25 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |