| 1 |
On 01-08-2011 23:51:16 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> A small thing which I've brought up for discussion twice (and both times |
| 3 |
> it was mostly ignored), but which I'd really like to see discussed or |
| 4 |
> even agreed on: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A simple policy making signed commits mandatory, plus a simple policy on |
| 7 |
> key length, permissible encryption/signature algorithms, and a |
| 8 |
> well-defined place where (public) keys are made available for verifying |
| 9 |
> and checking the validity of the signatures. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That's fine, but I'm not in favour of a random open-ended discussion |
| 12 |
between council members. Please come with a proposal that describes the |
| 13 |
trade-offs and has with clear voting points for the council. Link back |
| 14 |
to the community discussion on -dev (or -project?) and preferably sum up |
| 15 |
the thread(s). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 20 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives