1 |
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 08/14/2011 12:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
>> That way you give the regular 1 year term to someone who |
4 |
>> does his/her job, but allow to intervene directly as needed (and not |
5 |
>> after 6 months). |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> This requires dedicated resources, meaning having people monitor the |
8 |
> activity of these teams and report problems/progress. Even if we enforce |
9 |
> elections every 6 months, if leaders/teams were active, it is highly |
10 |
> likely to retain their positions so no harm can come out of that :). |
11 |
|
12 |
I think that a forced re-appointment every six months is going to |
13 |
create a lot more work than just keeping an eye on things. |
14 |
|
15 |
And I don't think that anybody is proposing a very heavy level of |
16 |
monitoring here. Monitoring just means making sure that people aren't |
17 |
running around with torches and pitchforks calling for the Devrel |
18 |
lead's head. |
19 |
|
20 |
Rich |