| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:31:07PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:46:27 +0000 malc wrote: |
| 3 |
> > What about simple transclusion? [1] Example of first few handbook-chapters |
| 4 |
> > at [2] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Looks quite readable in elinks. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > It's not pretty (the top TOC works, but the inline-toc on the |
| 9 |
> > right-hand-side doesn't work) That could be prevented with some <noinclude> |
| 10 |
> > directives on the source pages but I didn't want to trample over Sven. |
| 11 |
> > Would that work? (And yes - a few other includes are broken because this is |
| 12 |
> > rooted in my user-space and not under the handbook, but I think these |
| 13 |
> > should work if a page of this type was included in the Handbook namespace.) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Well, it doesn't have to be perfect, it should be usable enough. |
| 16 |
> Looks like transclusion solves usability problem :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm not sure why the discussion is still ongoing. The full-page handbooks |
| 19 |
have been implemented on the wiki a few days ago already (see my message to |
| 20 |
gentoo-project [1]). The redirects on the old handbooks have been put in |
| 21 |
place to the wiki ones. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/4141 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Wkr, |
| 26 |
Sven Vermeulen |
Archives