1 |
W dniu nie, 03.12.2017 o godzinie 23∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> As noted, there is one: analyzing the actions of those who are being |
4 |
> "attacked" to see why people are bothering to do it in the first |
5 |
> place. I sincerely doubt the offensive parties are doing what they are |
6 |
> doing without cause. |
7 |
|
8 |
Most of the affected developers are perfectly aware of the purpose of |
9 |
those attacks. If there was anything to be done to resolve the situation |
10 |
peacefully, we'd have done it long time ago. However, we can't and are |
11 |
not going to yield to people's unfounded demands based purely |
12 |
on the pressure inflicted by their misbehavior. |
13 |
|
14 |
I believe this is as far as I can answer you. Going beyond that goes |
15 |
into public judgment of private issues which is unacceptable on this |
16 |
mailing list. |
17 |
|
18 |
> But no, the Gentoo developers are always above reproach. |
19 |
|
20 |
This remark is highly inappropriate. |
21 |
|
22 |
> > I'm sorry but the purpose of this thread is not to convince you that |
23 |
> > the problems exist. If you haven't experienced them already, then it |
24 |
> > would be polite of you to either accept them as a fact, or do some |
25 |
> > research yourself. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Your job is not to convince me, personally, but the future reader of |
29 |
> this list. If you have given up on doing so then you have admitted |
30 |
> that you do not want to be held accountable for your actions because |
31 |
> you do not feel you need to explain why you are doing what you are |
32 |
> doing. |
33 |
|
34 |
It is quite ironic that you worry about a 'future reader' needing to be |
35 |
convinced in this past post (presuming you have some infinite knowledge |
36 |
of what kind of details would a 'future reader' consider satisfying) |
37 |
and at the same time you clearly reject to search for any past posts |
38 |
on the topic. |
39 |
|
40 |
Also, I should point out that you don't get to tell me what my job is. |
41 |
If you believe this thread should contain such data, please collect it |
42 |
yourself in your own time and include it in a reply. However, I should |
43 |
point out that you should respect all the rules we're talking about. |
44 |
I'd rather spend the time doing something that is of much greater |
45 |
importance of Gentoo users than some potential decision that will |
46 |
probably no longer be remembered in 12 months, except in snarky |
47 |
comments. |
48 |
|
49 |
> > I understand that you might want to know things. However, it is |
50 |
> > generally impolite if someone 'comes late to the party' and starts |
51 |
> > shouting questions that the existing participants know answers to |
52 |
> > already. This is distorting to the conversation at hand. |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> |
55 |
> I am not shouting. I am politely, but pointedly, asking questions that |
56 |
> you ostensibly should already have the answer to. If you do not have |
57 |
> the answer, then I feel it is clear to future readers of the list that |
58 |
> you are making decisions for nonsensical reasons. |
59 |
|
60 |
I should point out that your personal attacks are also unacceptable. |
61 |
If you disagree with the proposal, then please focus on discussing facts |
62 |
and not trying to prove your opponent's incompetence. |
63 |
|
64 |
> > People's private issues are not topic of this mailing list. It is |
65 |
> > generally impolite and unprofessional to discuss them publicly. Please |
66 |
> > don't do that. |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> |
69 |
> If the messages are being posted to gentoo-dev then I don't see why |
70 |
> you consider the issue private. At least one party intends it to be |
71 |
> public, probably because it's not a personal attack and is related to |
72 |
> Gentoo. |
73 |
|
74 |
One side being unprofessional does not excuse the other from being so. |
75 |
It only causes very unfair 'community judgment' where community judges |
76 |
based on abusive facts of one side where the other side is unable to |
77 |
provide counter-arguments without violating the privacy rules. |
78 |
|
79 |
Please consider that you have exhausted all the time I had available for |
80 |
you. Please do not expect any further answers from me, and give others |
81 |
a fair chance of getting developers' attention. |
82 |
|
83 |
-- |
84 |
Best regards, |
85 |
Michał Górny |