1 |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>> I am against the idea of having single people being able to easily |
3 |
>> make (possibly totally unfunded) decisions that affect Gentoo full |
4 |
>> project wide. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> I wonder why this works so well for other distros. |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm not aware of any large community-based distros that work this way. |
9 |
It might work this way with a corporate-funded model, in which case |
10 |
the guy in charge is typically appointed by whoever is fronting the |
11 |
cash to run the operation. In the end if it works out or not the |
12 |
people who gets hurt or rewarded the most are the people who put the |
13 |
guy in charge. |
14 |
|
15 |
The other model that tends to work this way is the start-up model |
16 |
where one person comes up with an idea and everybody else signs up to |
17 |
follow them. That is the Linux Torvalds or Daniel Robbins model. It |
18 |
is very hard to convert an organization to that model if it isn't |
19 |
already running that way without doing a fork, which is just another |
20 |
way of turning an established project into a start-up. |
21 |
|
22 |
Gentoo already has a project lead model, which we should continue to |
23 |
foster. In fact, most issues should be resolved by a team with a lead |
24 |
selected from the team. I think this actually happens the vast |
25 |
majority of the time - we just tend not to take so much notice when |
26 |
things are going well, and things only go to the council when that |
27 |
model isn't quite working. |
28 |
|
29 |
I don't really see a need for the council to be making decisions in an |
30 |
instant. They should only be involved if a decision lacks consensus, |
31 |
and if a decision lacks consensus then it really should get a |
32 |
reasonable amount of discussion. That doesn't mean that the council |
33 |
should feel paralyzed either. |
34 |
|
35 |
Finally, I think the council should have discretion about what it |
36 |
talks about. If there is a community-sponsored GLEP39 change and they |
37 |
want to vote support for a resolution telling all the devs that they |
38 |
think that only an idiot would vote for it, then they should be free |
39 |
to do so as long as they don't interfere with things. The council is |
40 |
basically the highest court when it comes to technical decision making |
41 |
for the distro and while they should refrain from micromanaging they |
42 |
shouldn't really be constrained from doing much of anything. If we do |
43 |
view them as the "CIO/CTO" of Gentoo then I'd just look at my |
44 |
situation at work. The CIO is very unlikely to walk into my office |
45 |
and ask me what I'm doing, since that is a waste of everybody's time. |
46 |
However, if the CIO did walk in I wouldn't get very far with an |
47 |
argument that he had no right to be there. |
48 |
|
49 |
Rich |