1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how |
4 |
> the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic |
5 |
> mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project). |
6 |
> gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda |
7 |
> regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce can |
8 |
> be used to draw attention to important things. How do you propose |
9 |
> people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do we go |
10 |
> back to the situation where threads get fragmented to multiple |
11 |
> mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere than |
12 |
> gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing list |
13 |
> just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project / |
14 |
> gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified |
15 |
> numbers from infra. |
16 |
|
17 |
gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we split |
18 |
discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably more, for |
19 |
example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on gentoo-pms then.) |
20 |
|
21 |
That's too complicated for my simple mind. |
22 |
|
23 |
Ulrich |