1 |
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:19:30 +0200 |
2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 30-09-2013 00:34:51 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
5 |
> > I really like this idea. If he could drop a new rev of the toolchain |
6 |
> > eclass into the tree, and make little p.masked updates to use it, then |
7 |
> > that would serve many purposes. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Honestly, please use an overlay instead. Mike's concern is not to be |
10 |
> ignored (I've seen the bugs), and I'm affraid I have to agree that |
11 |
> gaining skills (which takes time) and being careful is more important |
12 |
> than just moving forward here. |
13 |
|
14 |
If I'm nervous enough about a change that I would put it in a new eclass, it's |
15 |
because I need more test coverage. I won't get any in the toolchain overlay |
16 |
as I'm pretty sure I can count the number of people using it on one hand. What |
17 |
I'm probably going to do is add a toolchain-next eclass to the tree and have |
18 |
masked versions use it, moving changes into the real eclass when they get |
19 |
unmasked. |
20 |
|
21 |
But back on topic, Benda I'd be happy to review patches or help you out in the |
22 |
areas I cover. For now I think it would be best to keep doing what you're |
23 |
doing and we'll see how it goes. We definitely need more help. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk |
28 |
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org |
29 |
|
30 |
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 |