| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
This is the second item I would like to discuss for the next Council |
| 7 |
agenda ( or a later one ) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer |
| 10 |
has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
| 11 |
Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the |
| 12 |
Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote |
| 13 |
twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks |
| 14 |
a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having |
| 15 |
devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision, |
| 16 |
makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Again, this is just a brainstorming, so please let me know what you think. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOR62fAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC5P8P/i795gdBlM/pjD46F8yRqspF |
| 27 |
Bw07GWcJ7ysYRysuolqOA/MEcGn93ikCLvMvdFI/Y724GS0me+dSTT1hOrHa7KN6 |
| 28 |
+G6tB4f6LS+OxBCmW2r7meMufBbgizjlfQgZ9lF97N+zP3xD90XM2bsfN0GHG4qE |
| 29 |
SOA3YKpvHnFrBCcdo7BE4TDWGUZb0ET0EKDAPURdJ8MoR4mKEQRQHNwNENoPJ1I9 |
| 30 |
Vmw/bWeL+9A6qkmow2b1hua5j/LTsJ9Oevzsj1qmBf+MoyJiMtMP9qb9OMx4VSl/ |
| 31 |
C4MeZiz3MIIgSdKE2PV2FYTpyyqS7GBTGiCoJeYULNR8tvWyxZM3FAUfIN7ifgWy |
| 32 |
vu2VHwtfx3rFcS9/7p46IhA4eR6M7ZqCUe5Xu9UKBc0bSSflPDvyQbon1Zgmvu1c |
| 33 |
MzDF3ScVyt81vdshETWt7Zu9bxirPiLtuhTuF76YUhA7p40bqrmfImi+3ECrfeP2 |
| 34 |
ydC6ngCeFGQ+pl0yFnaJHhsZ6m9PvLfgrpBjvWXvRz5dpLWkrBVO1uf298AArJAt |
| 35 |
SyBuTooiKXo9cx2XTmn4/soyAQQIEcYJ2LWeBplT8m7OJVr7w5kamdH1Wj6rPhj7 |
| 36 |
nw3HfyHCNIHbGd6LdovrGug/Loys2hEYMHI4zQZXX8Tv3kzzCHKKrlJNn2Cmyc5y |
| 37 |
eFnARATvU5TkYfVj3RVx |
| 38 |
=1PSE |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives