Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-project] The problem of defunct and undermanned projects in Gentoo
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:12:58
Message-Id: 1500239562.11529.1.camel@gentoo.org
1 Hi, everyone.
2
3 I'd like to re-heat a worrying topic. More than once I've noticed that
4 some projects in Gentoo are either completely defunct or seriously
5 undermanned. This has been already tackled via the herd->project
6 conversion but the problem still exist and I'd like to try to solve it
7 better.
8
9 According to a quick grep, we have 175 teams defined right now. With
10 a quick grep, I get the following histogram:
11
12 Members Teams
13 0 3
14 1 36
15 2 34
16 3 19
17 4 20
18 5 22
19 6 12
20 ...
21
22 Besides the first two numbers, it doesn't look that bad. However, most
23 of the time the number of members does not map well into real activity.
24
25 I think some of the projects could really do with just new members.
26 However, not having active developers on the project makes it hard for
27 someone to actually issue a call for members.
28
29 I'm thinking of mailing every project in Gentoo (i.e. mass-mailing 175
30 projects, some developers will get a lot of mail). The mail would
31 contain some descriptive text and a list of project members. It would
32 serve two goals:
33
34 1. asking the project to verify its member list (some people still don't
35 keep their wiki up-to-date),
36
37 2. asking the project if they need me to send a call for members.
38
39 Projects that are entirely fine could reply with a simple 'ACK'. Others
40 could ask for help directly. Those who don't reply will be brought to
41 further consideration.
42
43 What do you think? Would you mind getting that amount of mail once?
44 Any other ideas?
45
46 --
47 Best regards,
48 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies