1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> All candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 are asked to answer the |
4 |
> following technical questions, since Gentoo Council 2013/2014 will |
5 |
> vote on at least some of relevant propositions. |
6 |
|
7 |
I'm going to answer the more general questions. |
8 |
|
9 |
> 01. What interval (in months) between introductions of new EAPIs do |
10 |
> you prefer? |
11 |
|
12 |
About one EAPI per year, on average. |
13 |
|
14 |
> 02. Will you vote for moving system packages (gcc, glibc etc.) to EAPI >=3? |
15 |
> 03. Will you vote for moving system packages (gcc, glibc etc.) to EAPI >=4? |
16 |
> 04. Will you vote for moving system packages (gcc, glibc etc.) to EAPI >=5? |
17 |
|
18 |
They should be moved away from EAPI 0 at some point, but this needs to |
19 |
be coordinated with their maintainers. |
20 |
|
21 |
> 05. Will you vote for deprecation of EAPI 0 in gentoo-x86? |
22 |
|
23 |
See previous answer. |
24 |
|
25 |
> 06. Will you vote for deprecation of EAPI 3 in gentoo-x86? |
26 |
|
27 |
Yes, after EAPI 6 has be accepted. We shouldn't have more than three |
28 |
or four EAPIs in active use. |
29 |
|
30 |
> 07. Will you vote for deprecation of EAPI 4 in gentoo-x86? |
31 |
|
32 |
See previous answer. (So, "no" for the upcoming council term.) |
33 |
|
34 |
Concerning your detailed (and sometimes very technical) questions 08 |
35 |
to 32 about EAPI 6, we already have a preliminary list of tentative |
36 |
features [1], including some from your list that were rejected for |
37 |
EAPI 5. This doesn't exclude that we add additional features to it, |
38 |
but it shouldn't be too many if we want to finalise EAPI 6 this year |
39 |
still. I'll make up my mind about the individual features when |
40 |
concrete proposals are on the table. |
41 |
|
42 |
Ulrich |
43 |
|
44 |
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Future_EAPI/EAPI_6_tentative_features |