| 1 |
George Prowse wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> The munging or whatever it is called is still active. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
Still switched *off* you mean. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I would still like reply=to to go to the list an not the person. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
Sheesh, does your email client /still/ not get that right? Some of the |
| 10 |
#gentoo-desktop bods were talking about this in evolution: |
| 11 |
<johnny> what's the deal with evo not allowing me to "reply to list" |
| 12 |
<johnny> it never shows up in the context menu |
| 13 |
<tuXXX> johnny: and in the "Message" menu? |
| 14 |
<johnny> yes it is there, but no shortcut |
| 15 |
<tuXXX> I have Ctrl+L |
| 16 |
<johnny> aha.. it's greyed out |
| 17 |
<johnny> yes, shortcut, but greyed out |
| 18 |
<tuXXX> (but my evo is 2.21.1) |
| 19 |
<tuXXX> It's greyed out for me on non-ML mails |
| 20 |
<johnny> aha.. i finally found a list that doesn't munge, thought some of |
| 21 |
them were not doing it that were |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
(That last comment is interesting: it shows that many Gentoo users are only |
| 24 |
just starting to learn that the lists are munged, and that this makes a |
| 25 |
difference to the utility of a fully functional client.) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> How likely is that going to happen? Gentoo-dev gets it right |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
Gentoo dev mungs yes. Obviously we differ on whether that is the right thing |
| 30 |
to do; I think it's totally appropriate for a novice user group, but a bit |
| 31 |
lame for a dev m-l tbh. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> Flame commence for the billionth time... |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
Ah well, you know my feeling on this; it's up to the user group I guess. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list |
Archives