Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [project] Re: [RFC] some global useflags
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:19:49
Message-Id: b41005390810192319t10ee8d35xd292ddabd4e694a1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] [project] Re: [RFC] some global useflags by Steve Long
1 On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > Ryan Hill wrote:
3 >> Steve Long wrote:
4 >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>> > Steve Long wrote:
6 >>> >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an
7 >>> >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it.
8 >>> >> >
9 >>> >> I'm aware of the prior discussion.
10 >>> >> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can.
11 >>> >
12 >>> > Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you
13 >>> > didn't you understand?
14 >>> >
15 >>> No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have
16 >>> light to shed; clearly not.
17 >>>
18 >>> Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual
19 >>> information to add; I realise you like long fruitless mail
20 >>> 'discussions', and apparently have lots of time for them, but I
21 >>> don't, and I don't enjoy reading them either. This kind of one-liner
22 >>> with zero content, and no intent but to insult, should simply be
23 >>> binned without sending imo.
24 >>
25 >> Okay, Steve, stop. I don't think you realize it, but you are trolling
26 >> this list.
27 > That wasn't my intention; I added that comment simply to stop the flow of
28 > one-line emails.
29 >
30 >> Every second post is you and Ciaran bitching at each other
31 > I do wish one of you devs would pick him up on his behaviour _on the list_
32 > one of these days.. instead it's _always_ me who gets the flak.
33 >
34 > Or do you think his post was anything other than a "one-liner with zero
35 > content, and no intent but to insult"?
36 >
37 >> or you complaining about every single thing we do that you
38 >> don't personally like.
39 > Not complaining, simply pointing out better ways to do things; a technical
40 > discussion iow. The reason that has been more difficult a discussion than
41 > it should be is because of the unpleasant comments from McCreesh, Ferdy and
42 > Leverton.
43
44 Not all things are technical in nature.
45
46 >
47 >> We appreciate your input, but please respect our
48 >> right to do things the way we think is best for us, even if they aren't
49 >> aligned to your personal preferences.
50 >>
51 > I was never under the impression that Gentoo devs would do anything other
52 > than whatever they wanted.
53 >
54 > Can you tell me what a 'server' USE flag _breaks_?
55 >
56
57 It breaks usability. I realize that is hard to measure but we have
58 discussed this multiple times and have decided it is a Bad Idea for
59 users and a Bad Idea for us. So it was not done.
60
61 -Alec