Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 2011.08.04 21:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 21:42 Wed 03 Aug , Roy Bamford wrote:
> > No problem - something as radical as that might have stirred more
> > interest.
>
> And we'd hate to have people actually interested in this. =)
>
> FWIW, I'd like to see us have 3 people at most on the council.
>
> But regardless of how many people there are, I think they should be
> unequal with different areas of responsibility, independent
> decision-making authority, and only one person at the top to revert
> their decisions. I don't really like how all members are at-large.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
> Donnie Berkholz
> Council Member / Sr. Developer
> Gentoo Linux
> Blog: http://dberkholz.com
>
A smaller committee for a chief technical officer fits better into a
normal corporate structure. A smaller council could form special
interest groups to address individual problems so nothing would be lost
from the reduced numbers.
--
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
trustees
|
|
