List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01-08-2011 19:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 07:59 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 01-08-2011 18:57:43 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Thanks to Theo ( tampakrap ) for reminding me, I would like to
>>> add the gentoo/user/cloaks issue to the agenda. Based on this
>>> comment, it seems like we need a council vote on the matter,
>>> so I would like to get this sorted as soon as possible.
>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and
>> who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the GLEP that
>> Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for this topic
>> without that GLEP in place?
> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri
> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility
> to devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP
> defining the devrel policy just like then one for QA.
Just to be clear, one thing is having a GLEP about DevRel policy,
another that has been mentioned before is having a GLEP about DevRel. I
strongly disagree with the latter. For the former I prefer the current
format of having DevRel work on a policy and have the council approve it
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----