| 1 |
Fabian Groffen schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On 26-10-2011 23:03:39 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Fabian Groffen schrieb: |
| 4 |
>>> You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why. |
| 5 |
>>> That's the idea of the ChangeLog file. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> One of the arguments for logging everything in ChangeLog was that |
| 8 |
>> extracting this kind information from CVS can be cumbersome. So, I would |
| 9 |
>> not agree with "typically". |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I do not see your point. Does my sentence change for you if you remove |
| 12 |
> the "typically"? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If the reason why you want ChangeLogs is avoiding having to get the |
| 15 |
information about commit activity from CVS, then the proposal to make |
| 16 |
exaclty that the minimal ChangeLog entry seems reasonable. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If in addition you always want to know about the motivation for the |
| 19 |
commit, then it won't be sufficient I guess. But based on the previous |
| 20 |
discussion on mandatory ChangeLogs I have not gotten the impression that |
| 21 |
this was typically called for. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives