1 |
On 20:39 Thu 14 Jul , Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> On 14.07.2011 20:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thursday 14 of July 2011 20:13:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
4 |
> >> Keeping a list and periodically going through it seems fine to me. Are |
5 |
> >> you or someone else interested in joining devrel to get this implemented |
6 |
> >> and maintained? The policy should probably be written as a GLEP and I |
7 |
> >> can help with that but until GSoC is over I am pretty much fully booked |
8 |
> >> for Gentoo time so I would like to avoid championing it at this point. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> Regards, |
11 |
> >> Petteri |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Not interested in joining devrel, sorry, but I could start writing the GLEP. |
14 |
> > Is there an existing one about cloaks that we could improve, or start from |
15 |
> > scratch? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I am not aware of any of the existing GLEPs covering the matter so from |
18 |
> scratch is probably required. For the GLEP I think it's enough if we |
19 |
> keep things simple and just list the conditions for getting and keeping |
20 |
> each type of cloak and the process of getting requesting a cloak. |
21 |
|
22 |
Why should this be a GLEP? Seems like it should be covered by either |
23 |
devrel or userrel, no need for the council to get involved as it's not a |
24 |
global issue. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Thanks, |
28 |
Donnie |
29 |
|
30 |
Donnie Berkholz |
31 |
Council Member / Sr. Developer |
32 |
Gentoo Linux |
33 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |