| 1 |
Steven J Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> As stated, summarise correctly, and even better, follow a more professional |
| 3 |
> process, and this sub-topic would never have been raised. As it is, this is |
| 4 |
> about the level of debate I expected; blame the messenger, and avoid our own |
| 5 |
> problems. I am glad there's an election on. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Without commenting on this specific issue can I use this as an excuse to |
| 8 |
remind council candidates that of the 13 people running for council only |
| 9 |
5 have posted manifestos? While I typically grep the various mailing |
| 10 |
lists to try to get a feel for each candidate, having somebody actually |
| 11 |
clearly state their position would be helpful. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Perhaps we should have a _reopen_nomination option in future elections? |
| 14 |
I'm a bit uncomfortable having to vote for somebody who doesn't even |
| 15 |
put up a simple statement of what they stand for. I could care less |
| 16 |
about the format of such a statement - if you just want to post one line |
| 17 |
and say "I'll do what I think is best - now let me get back to my CVS |
| 18 |
commits" at least I'll know how they want to be evaluated (CIA, here I |
| 19 |
come). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
There is only a week left... |
Archives