Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-project@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:56:50 +0200
On 03-08-2011 10:43:10 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 22:16 Mon 01 Aug     , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Auto generation of ChangeLogs, implies changes, and also influences 
> > how current ChangeLog information is to be handled. What if 
> > auto-generation is done, what does it take?
> 
> For the purposes of a council meeting, I think we should construct a 
> small set of specific proposals to choose from so we don't get mired in 
> endless discussions during the meeting.
> 
> I'd like to offer a couple of them for us to choose between.
> 
> 1. Include all commits, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog 
> messages
> 
> 2. Allow commit filtering, don't retroactively change existing ChangeLog 
> messages
> 
> - Filters to allow: keywording, stabilization, removal of ebuilds. 
> Whoever implements the code can decide on the format of said filters.
> 
> 
> Do any council members feel strongly that we should include additional 
> options, or is it good enough to just make a choice on these two?

I listed the questions I think are relevant at the bottom of my mail.  I
feel you forgot the most important one: should ChangeLogs be
auto-generated at all?.  Only if yes,
- should all commit messages be included (sort of first part of your 1
  and 2)
- should commit messages be appended to/updated? (sort of last part of
  your 1 and 2)
- should existing information in ChangeLog files be retained?

I have the impression that any detail on how and what can only be dealt
with after it is clear what the majority of the council members lean
towards.  E.g. useless to list and discuss a big variety of filters if
there is no support for allowing them at all.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
-- Markos Chandras
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
-- Donnie Berkholz
References:
Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Next by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)


Updated Jun 27, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-project mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.