Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:57:02
Message-Id: 4EDBB42E.2040708@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13 by Markos Chandras
1 Markos Chandras schrieb:
2 > On 12/04/2011 03:42 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
3 >> Fabian Groffen schrieb:
4 >>> Ok, you mean the --quiet-build=y default that most recent Portage
5 >>> uses, right? Also known to some as the parallel build output.
6 >
7 >> Yes
8 > I agree that the decision was made too fast but reverting seems like a
9 > joke to me. People will think that we are making fun of them by
10 > changing the defaults all the time. Imho it is too late to go back.
11
12 Such a decision would surely not be a joke. We are talking about the
13 testing version of portage here, not the stable one. While people might
14 wonder, why it was changed back, something like that should be expected,
15 if you dont use stable keywords.
16 Additionally, everyone could do whatever he wants with the "too late to
17 go back" - "argument". Just wait until after council meeting, do your
18 changes and claim "too late to go back", so effectively removing the
19 ability to decide about a question for the council? ;-)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies