1 |
On 27-10-2011 00:13:41 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
2 |
> Fabian Groffen schrieb: |
3 |
> > On 26-10-2011 23:03:39 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
4 |
> >> Fabian Groffen schrieb: |
5 |
> >>> You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why. |
6 |
> >>> That's the idea of the ChangeLog file. |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> One of the arguments for logging everything in ChangeLog was that |
9 |
> >> extracting this kind information from CVS can be cumbersome. So, I would |
10 |
> >> not agree with "typically". |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I do not see your point. Does my sentence change for you if you remove |
13 |
> > the "typically"? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If the reason why you want ChangeLogs is avoiding having to get the |
16 |
> information about commit activity from CVS, then the proposal to make |
17 |
> exaclty that the minimal ChangeLog entry seems reasonable. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If in addition you always want to know about the motivation for the |
20 |
> commit, then it won't be sufficient I guess. But based on the previous |
21 |
> discussion on mandatory ChangeLogs I have not gotten the impression that |
22 |
> this was typically called for. |
23 |
|
24 |
I still don't see your point, sorry. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Fabian Groffen |
29 |
Gentoo on a different level |