| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 15 May 2008 17:29:56 -0400
|
| 5 |
Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 8 |
> > tove brought up an interesting point from GLEP 39: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > If any meeting has less than 50% attendance by council members, a |
| 11 |
> > new election for all places must be held within a month. The 'one |
| 12 |
> > year' is then reset from that point. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > musikc questioned whether that was only intended for the regular |
| 15 |
> > meetings or also irregular ones like this. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Open up the floodgates, folks. What do you think, what should we do? I |
| 18 |
> > look forward to hearing your advice. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Did this meeting have sufficient notice to be considered an official |
| 22 |
> meeting? Normally bylaws that govern matters like these also stipulate |
| 23 |
> that meetings have a certain notice process to ensure that everybody |
| 24 |
> knows about them. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It was announced at the last meeting, so it had one week notice. As
|
| 27 |
for intent, you'd have to ask g2boojum and ciaranm because they wrote
|
| 28 |
it. But the wording in the GLEP could hardly be clearer.
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards,
|
| 31 |
Ferris
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
- --
|
| 39 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 40 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
|
| 41 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 42 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgsrVIACgkQQa6M3+I///dLfACeLzlLaP3a1+MCFI7/BElz1HbB
|
| 45 |
LjIAoKmcwlfkvamQjWAZ9J1geonZ0mUY
|
| 46 |
=Q1B7
|
| 47 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives