Ulrich Mueller wrote:

>> Let's say I propose an idea that 80% of the council likes but 80%
>> of developers want. This doesn't seem unreasonable since I was very
>> highly ranked in voting with a platform that involves totally
>> changing our leadership structure, and yet the council insists it
>> cannot change GLEP 39. I would be pretty pissed if most of Gentoo
>> wanted something but the "cabal" at the top didn't even let them
>> make the choice.
> 
> I've read this paragraph twice, but I still fail to understand it.
> Why do you call it a "cabal" if there is a large majority both amongst
> council members and devs in general?
> 
I think it's a typo-- the first line should read:
>> Let's say I propose an idea that 80% of the council _dislikes_ but 80%
>> of developers want.
-- 
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)