Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
From: George Prowse <cokehabit@...>
Subject: Re: PMS
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:16:54 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:58:15 +0000
> George Prowse <cokehabit@...> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:18:08 +0100
>>> "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@g.o> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 15, 2007 5:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
>>>> <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:
>>>>> Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted
>>>>> [...]
>>>> Which has yet to happen.
>>> Well no. But that doesn't stop what Roy said from being utter
>>> nonsense.
>>>
>> But which would hold more weight?
> 
> Huh?
> 
ok, lets put it in easy language...

If a package manager that Gentoo uses happens to use ebuilds, right? And 
the main developer of another package manager thinks that it shouldn't 
be used for that reason then it would be logical to never use that PM 
for PACKAGE MANAGEMENT. Right?

Actually, that would give pretty much anything weight over said PM.

http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
-- 
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list


References:
PMS
-- Steve Long
Re: PMS
-- Roy Bamford
Re: PMS
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: PMS
-- Denis Dupeyron
Re: PMS
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: PMS
Next by thread:
Re: PMS
Previous by date:
Re: PMS
Next by date:
was any decision made?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-project mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.