| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 08:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 20:39 Thu 14 Jul , Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 14.07.2011 20:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > On Thursday 14 of July 2011 20:13:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
>> >> Keeping a list and periodically going through it seems fine to me. Are |
| 6 |
>> >> you or someone else interested in joining devrel to get this implemented |
| 7 |
>> >> and maintained? The policy should probably be written as a GLEP and I |
| 8 |
>> >> can help with that but until GSoC is over I am pretty much fully booked |
| 9 |
>> >> for Gentoo time so I would like to avoid championing it at this point. |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > Not interested in joining devrel, sorry, but I could start writing the GLEP. |
| 12 |
>> > Is there an existing one about cloaks that we could improve, or start from |
| 13 |
>> > scratch? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I am not aware of any of the existing GLEPs covering the matter so from |
| 16 |
>> scratch is probably required. For the GLEP I think it's enough if we |
| 17 |
>> keep things simple and just list the conditions for getting and keeping |
| 18 |
>> each type of cloak and the process of getting requesting a cloak. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Why should this be a GLEP? Seems like it should be covered by either |
| 21 |
> devrel or userrel, no need for the council to get involved as it's not a |
| 22 |
> global issue. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
in the past, we made Gentoo e-mail forward rewards a Council issue as |
| 25 |
the project in general couldnt agree on it, and they (being elected |
| 26 |
representation to decided project-wide issues) finished it off. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
in this case, i dont see anyone who doesnt want this to happen, so we |
| 29 |
can probably delegate it to userrel, have them formulate a plan (seems |
| 30 |
like we've got all the pieces already), and then just post the result |
| 31 |
here for all to review. |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives