Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Voting and schedule
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:03:30
Message-Id: 4BCF99FD.6090504@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Voting and schedule by Denis Dupeyron
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 17-04-2010 23:56, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
5 > How are we going to vote on all this? It would be interesting to be
6 > able to vote on each topic/question individually. We could list all
7 > answers to multiple choice questions and yes/no questions, rank them
8 > using our usual condorcet voting system, and only retain the highest
9 > ranked answer for each question. Other ideas?
10
11 Even though it might be desirable to be able to vote on single points of
12 the discussion, a governance policy document can't be just a sum of
13 points. Therefore, if we opt to have a vote for individual points, I
14 propose in the end we chose someone to write a coherent document based
15 on those points and to submit the final document to a global vote.
16 It would be interesting to see how to act if a final document gets
17 rejected by a referendum after each individual point is approved.
18
19 > Schedule and other practical issues? The goal is to have the new text
20 > available before we vote for a new council. Let's start planning this
21 > so that we can make sure we can make that target.
22
23 Seems a good idea.
24
25
26 - --
27 Regards,
28
29 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
30 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections
31 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
33 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
34
35 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLz5n9AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPe+IQALaaD8tYy1Qnu+nJyDSx6kC3
36 Po7LENuSPVl4LNeGUMPP6kTx5CvVSuDuRK9YdOrPjjj6sYcRgdbWdNmEkt7mOdfX
37 1z104nzuMUU5nc3WGFFJrlOJAtLSj/3QIXqnzD4UszCwf+5717ZK5JI3QUvEUEba
38 cEbyi5F2kITkrwdw0X2rUAvTjN/nTsooDrZVbxwkI6N/jXA9j4B+m2pj3Hdfokx7
39 Rx2pL2XnokUNOMDETKgYOS9OKE/W+Mg9i6bwfHRtKJEFuAAtm53DbHsI0oAj20Ro
40 jNEoGRxsNP/+mV5CwrGvHHmFe2FJbwLRf0GAm2ybREY2gOTyD8mtnbwR2RPpKegS
41 GOah/0bl6nRVAzObr/zfViLlpiAnSjlCu3zn6iE8bvWoWfeJmpC5Ur390aP37OyB
42 3V6hjJYrr7wire1S11r0ZvMVFWT//bFZhbVLXNH/IPVNf63N8dQ90zCV7fGPc9GE
43 5zsewNiZhZWpr4BIZwk1Mcz5KYkTNLDjmvQUqhv/EeafDNLggu9uxJyDpD9vBiBv
44 mZu6dK6gyc3WdDQjNTzJLSOajs+YC7iohen9A9PoVLtf/8ImJZT+cmG4D9XOTf8U
45 yCsyecXdr93W5tmWdYbQ5a7GU1RBDBHqL/FX1pdAOkBZIK3qPhatiENZPRZmB1P7
46 zEdkB4RsCuwcmIXB+siO
47 =NoPE
48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Voting and schedule Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>