Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-project
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-project@g.o
From: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:13:40 +0100
Zac Medico schrieb:
>> 2011/12/4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o>:
>>> I already stated that I would leave the call to zmedico as lead
>>> developer of portage. Giving him the arguments and the data to make the
>>> decision, but watching whether his reasoning is sound. That means
>>> clearly saying where it is based on fact and where it is based on opinion.
>>> (I wouldn't mind if he made an entirely opinion based decision, as long
>>> as he didn't claim it to be fact-based)
> 
> I think it's difficult or impossible to get an reasonably unbiased
> sample of the population of Gentoo users as a whole. Voting is only fair
> when you can get a reasonably unbiased sample of the whole population.

This is something I can agree with.

> Due to human nature, people who are unhappy with the change in defaults
> are more likely to express their opinion publicly than people who
> welcome the change in defaults. This tends to bias statistics in favor
> of the unhappy people.

But this is precisely what I meant above and in my older post. You have
no idea to which extent this effect is present, much less whether other
effects which could introduce bias in the other direction outweigh your
"unhappy with the change in defaults" group.
You keep on repeating this as if it were fact, but have no data to base
this claim on.

One way to investigate would be to sample statements in the forum
thread, and determining how many responded with personal preference and
how many with practical arguments. It would still have to be accounted
for those who try to rationalize their pre-conceived opinion with ad-hoc
arguments, but better than nothing at all which is the current case.


Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Zac Medico
References:
Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Thomas Sachau
Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Fabian Groffen
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Thomas Sachau
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Markos Chandras
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Patrick Lauer
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-project: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Previous by date:
Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Next by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13


Updated Jun 17, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-project mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.