1 |
On 14-08-2011 12:12:32 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer |
3 |
> has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
4 |
> Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the |
5 |
> Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote |
6 |
> twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks |
7 |
> a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having |
8 |
> devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision, |
9 |
> makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
10 |
|
11 |
In a way, yes you're right. However, escalations to Council should be |
12 |
rare. Council members were elected by dev community, so apparently |
13 |
people didn't bother about them being to do so. |
14 |
I think it would be elegant when DevRel members in the Council would |
15 |
abstain from a vote, but if that makes a small remaining group of |
16 |
voters... |
17 |
|
18 |
Perhaps it would be better when DevRel members in the Council would be |
19 |
replaced by (their) proxies for such vote? Or should random people |
20 |
picked from the dev community and asked if they want to cast a vote? |
21 |
|
22 |
Perhaps the Council should be released from this task at all, and |
23 |
instead should be given the job to assemble a jury out of the dev |
24 |
community (with non-involvement in DevRel) that is to examine the case, |
25 |
and make a final verdict that the Council will accept/act upon. |
26 |
|
27 |
Just brainstorming along with you. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Fabian Groffen |
32 |
Gentoo on a different level |