| 1 |
On 04/18/2010 03:45 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 04/18/2010 12:23 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Does the council need a lead? All top-level projects have a lead |
| 6 |
>>>> except the council. Should we maintain this exception? |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> How do we elect a lead? Do the developers do it or should it be left |
| 9 |
>>>> to the newly elected council members? |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> What role will a council lead play? Will the role be similar to the |
| 13 |
>>> speaker of the house (ie, only manage the meetings and cast the |
| 14 |
>>> tie-breaking vote), or more like the head of the cabinet of ministers |
| 15 |
>>> (take the final decision based on input from other members)? |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Having someone dedicated in charge of agendas and charing meetings is |
| 19 |
>> useful at least. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Didn't we have a secretary in charge of agendas once? And well, |
| 23 |
> chairing of meetings could simply be rotated amongst the council |
| 24 |
> members. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
The person in charge can still delegate to a secretary. The point is he |
| 28 |
would make sure to remind and replace him if the secretary goes MIA. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Petteri |
Archives