List Archive: gentoo-project
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01-08-2011 20:46, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 08:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can
>>>> and who can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the
>>>> GLEP that Petteri refers to. Does it make sense to vote for
>>>> this topic without that GLEP in place?
>>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request.
>>> Petteri suggested to have the council vote and transfer the
>>> responsibility to devrel, which in accordance will include this
>>> in a new GLEP defining the devrel policy just like then one for
>> Ok, thanks. Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote
>> for transferring the cloak responsibility to devrel?
> Yes I think this is pretty much the gist.
No, I'm sorry but that's not the point.
First, these users issues need to be moved to "community relations", the
project I and Petteri have been talking about to unite DevRel and UserRel.
In any case, the 2 issues at stake here are:
1. Do we want / support gentoo/user cloaks or not? If so, what is needed
for anyone to get them.
2. What should gentoo/contributor cloaks mean? Should they be reserved
to ATs/HTs/other official project members? How can they be requested /
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----