| 1 |
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:31:38 +0000 |
| 2 |
Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I agree that the EAPI is not fixed until it's agreed and implemented |
| 4 |
> by portage. The PMS thing seems extraneous to Gentoo needs atm; it's |
| 5 |
> more to enable other projects to interoperate with the tree. It |
| 6 |
> certainly wasn't needed for pkgcore imo. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Erm. You need to learn the relationship between EAPI and PMS. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
PMS describes EAPIs 0 and 1, and will describe any future EAPIs once |
| 11 |
they're agreed upon. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives