Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council?
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:24:50
Message-Id: 1313339068.2962.4@NeddySeagoon
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council? by Rich Freeman
1 On 2011.08.14 15:52, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Roy Bamford
3 > <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
4
5 [snip]
6
7 > > I see the council members as officers of the Foundation, not
8 > > directors of the Foundation. The two roles are different and should
9 > > be spilt.
10 >
11 > Well, that's the whole two-headed monster bit. They're not really
12 > officers or directors of the Foundation, and "Gentoo" the distro and
13 > Gentoo the Foundation aren't actually the same entity by our odd
14 > organizational design. Maybe you could call the Council the
15 > leadership of the employee union. :)
16
17 Lets double all the employees pay :)
18
19 > Long term it wouldn't hurt to change this. Short-term I'd like to
20 > let
21 > the Trustees continue to focus on getting the Foundation itself in
22 > better shape.
23 >
24 > Rich
25 >
26 The present two headed monster set up works well enough based on the
27 good will of everyone involved while things are going well. It is
28 likely to fail under external pressure if things are not going so well.
29
30 I would like to fix it in the short to medium term so we are prepared
31 for a bad patch. Meanwhile, I agree that "the Trustees need to
32 continue to focus on getting the Foundation itself better shape."
33
34 --
35 Regards,
36
37 Roy Bamford
38 (Neddyseagoon) a member of
39 elections
40 gentoo-ops
41 forum-mods
42 trustees