Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [GLEP 39 overhaul] Do we want to make changes to the role of the council?
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 01:11:34
Message-Id: AANLkTilnHN_XIBaAbQVweCPhIJQbPebrVYEwE0kIFCHP@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Do we want to make changes to the role of the council? by Denis Dupeyron
1 Summary for this topic. Here's the list of voting propositions that we
2 should discuss during the next meeting.
3
4 - The council only reacts to requests from developers. The council
5 does not have other powers than making decisions which affects
6 multiple projects (i.e. GLEPs and EAPIs, anything else?) and being the
7 final court of appeal for disciplinary decisions.
8
9 - The council only reacts to requests from developers and has direct
10 control over projects (feel free to suggest better language here),
11 including but not limited to creating, killing, merging splitting
12 projects, changing their leads, etc...
13
14 - The council should be proactive in setting a direction and act
15 accordingly. The council does not however have direct control over
16 projects. (does this make any sense?)
17
18 - The council should be proactive in setting a direction and act
19 accordingly, and has direct control over projects (feel free to
20 suggest better language here), including but not limited to creating,
21 killing, merging splitting projects, revoking their leads, etc...
22
23 - Same as above but the trustees can revoke the council when they see
24 fit, especially when their actions are considered dangerous to the
25 foundation.
26
27 Denis.