1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Jan 23, 2008 7:23 PM, Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
>> Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> > On Monday, 21. January 2008 19:19:12 Steve Long wrote: |
7 |
>> >> And when 90% say they don't like the way they get treated by Gentoo |
8 |
>> >> devs, there is a real issue. |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> > "The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with |
11 |
>> > the average voter." - Winston Churchill |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > s/voter/user/ |
14 |
>> > |
15 |
>> Churchill also said democracy is the worst form of government: apart from |
16 |
>> all the others. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> He also questioned why anyone should worry about Arabs being gassed in |
19 |
>> Mesopotamia, so maybe you can just speak for yourself; would you prefer |
20 |
>> to live under Saddam, Amin or Hitler than a democratic government? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> These statements on governance are completely irrelevant here. |
23 |
Er I didn't bring them up. TBH it was only an aside to the main issue of how |
24 |
to involve users. The rest of the discussion has in fact been about |
25 |
governance, so I am puzzled that you think it "completely irrelevant." |
26 |
|
27 |
> They |
28 |
> apply to large countries with populations in (at least) millions. For |
29 |
> small communities of several thousand (very small countries ie), |
30 |
> direct democracy works best. But even that is not relevant here, since |
31 |
> the responsibilities of a country's leaders are very different from |
32 |
> the "responsibilities" of a volunteer-run organisation. |
33 |
In your opinion: others clearly feel it relevant. |
34 |
|
35 |
> `Responsibilities` is in quotes because you cannot really "police" an |
36 |
> organisation that works for free in it's free time. |
37 |
> |
38 |
Hmm and there's no such thing as forum moderators or irc ops? |
39 |
|
40 |
> Hence, a combination of meritocracy and democracy is the best way to |
41 |
> run these. |
42 |
I'm fine with both. |
43 |
|
44 |
> The basic tenants of democracy of "equality" and "freedom" |
45 |
> have no meaning whatsoever in this context. |
46 |
Again, in your opinion. How can the "basic tenants of democracy" have |
47 |
nothing do with it if one is using "a combination of meritocracy and |
48 |
democracy"? |
49 |
|
50 |
> In fact, I'm tempted to invoke Godwin's Law at this point. |
51 |
> |
52 |
puhleez. |
53 |
|
54 |
> This is a *completely* different situation, and one simply cannot make |
55 |
> generalisations such as you have. |
56 |
> |
57 |
I didn't; you inferred and generalised an awful lot all on your own ;) |
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |