Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:18:37
Message-Id: 4E849A49.9080105@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing by "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon"
1 On 09/29/2011 12:09 PM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
2 > On 29/09/11 16:11, Patrick Lauer wrote:
3 >> Otherwise some funny person will use a 4-bit key that expires tomorrow
4 >> just to point out the missing details ...
5 >
6 > That is a simple case of "don't be a jackass".
7 > I do not feel that it is a productive use of my time to outlegislate
8 > being a jackass in Gentoo.
9 >
10 > Regards,
11 > Tony V.
12
13 If I comment on this, I will be bikeshedding ... j/k.
14
15 I'd be happy just to see a policy in place saying "we reject unsigned
16 manifests". I mention the Council because that's one avenue for gentoo
17 wide policy. The other is a GLEP, but I don't think that's necessary
18 here, or at least not yet.
19
20
21 --
22 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
23 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
24 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
25 GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
26 GnuPG ID : D0455535

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>