Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
> On 01-08-2011 21:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we
>> split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably
>> more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on
>> gentoo-pms then.)
>> That's too complicated for my simple mind.
> Unfortunately you can't prevent it. You won't be able to force
> people to use gentoo-council to discuss any technical issues that
> have always been discussed on the gentoo-dev ml because it's simpler
> for the council members.
Technical discussions started on -dev could stay there, of course.
Generally, trying to move a thread from one mailing list to another
won't work (and only lead to a discussion split between both lists).
The point is that the current scheme does not really work and we end
up discussing technical issues on -project where they are off-topic.
Two examples from today are the sub-threads about "signed commits" [1]
and "optional runtime dependencies" [2].
Ulrich
[1] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_cb85cb70b49c12b6194f972dbc7fbcdb.xml>
[2] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_5e6199cb16f1af820200fa4bcebbf08d.xml>
|
|
