1 |
Robert Buchholz wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday, 21. July 2007 02:37, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Is it just me or is the reply to function not working on this list |
4 |
>> yet? When I hit reply to, it appears that it is not going to the |
5 |
>> list but to the person that sent the message I am replying too. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Oh, I did this as a forward since asking just George may not do any |
8 |
>> good. Sorry if this messes up the headers or something. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> This list does not have "reply to munging" enabled, meaning the Reply-To |
11 |
> will not be set to the list address for you. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> On some reasons why that often is a good idea, read the |
14 |
> article "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" [1]. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Please use the "Reply to all" or "Reply to list" features of your |
17 |
> mailer, they all have either of those if not both. Please do not use |
18 |
> forwarding. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Also, you could write some procmail rule (if applicable) to reset the |
21 |
> Reply-To for your incoming mail, see [2] for details. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -R. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> [1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html |
27 |
> [2] |
28 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/reply-to.xml#doc_chap1_sect3 |
29 |
|
30 |
Oh dear, I just realised that. I'll go through my sent emails and |
31 |
re-post them to the list. Sorry. I don't think any have gone to just the |
32 |
individuals though but i'll check. |
33 |
|
34 |
G |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-project@g.o mailing list |